Camdiox Sony Nex focal reducer with box

Similar Posts

29 Comments

  1. Hi,
    I bought the Camdiox EOS-MFT focal reducer. I haven’t gotten around to testing it yet as I am waiting for a replacement battery for my GH2. I un-boxed the focal reducer when it arrived and realised that the optics assembly wobbles about in the body of the adapter. It can be moved back an forth by about 1mm. I fail to see how this wouldn’t affect focus and sharpness. At this point in time I assume it is a fault in manufacture as I cant see an adjustment screw or anything to fix the optics in place. I have contacted the seller, but thought it might be worth checking with others that have the same product or products like it weather they encountered the same problem. I cant wait to test the adapter as soon as my new battery arrives.

    1. Hi David

      That certainly sounds wrong. The optical assembly in my unit is rock solid and as you say any movement would affect the focus. Hope you get it sorted soon because when it’s working it seems quite a good unit.

  2. Best thing since sliced bread !
    I have a cupboard full of 35mm lenses whose focal lengths are too long with my E-PM2 micro 43.
    Now my Tamron 28-210 f 3.8 spherical which without adaptor is 56-420 mm is a more useful 46-360 ish
    f 2.9 and my Chinon Tomioka 50mm f 1.4 is instead of being 100mm is now a beautiful 85mm astonishing
    f 1.0. I’ve checked and it really is a stop faster. Where would you get an f1.0 lens for £45 ?

    remember with micro 43 the crop factor is 1.7 with adaptor not 1.5 as with APSC

  3. Thanks for your review Simon. I am thinking og getting a Sony A7r or A7s, (have not made my mind up yet). Is the adapter a full frame sensor or APF-C ? I already use the original Metabones EF to NEX on my Nex 7 but this does not work full frame only Apf-c and as you said the latter adapters are too expensive. Would be obliged for your comment on this. Regards Vic

    1. Hi Vic

      The adaptor is designed for APS-C sensors so wouldn’t work with a full frame. On a full frame you would get an APS-C sized image circle in the middle of the full frame sensor.

  4. Thanks for the info – had been looking at these and did wonder if the huge price difference between this and the metabones meant quality would be an issue, your pics were very helpful.

  5. Simon,

    Two years later, would you recommend this as a way to use M42 and K-mount lenses on digital?

    In particular I’m curious whether you had issues with wider lenses hitting the glass in the focal reducer, as some commenters on pentaxforums have reported.

    1. Hi
      Actually I would recommend it yes. I’ve had no issues personally with any lenses fouling the elements of the convertor and found it to be a useful addition to me kit. I’ve actually changed to a Fuji X-T1 since I wrote that article and I’ve been thinking about buying the same unit in fuji x mount.

      1. Fantastic, thank you! I already have a number of M42->EF and K->EF adapters anyway to use these lenses with my Canon 5D, but of course using K lenses on the Canon means snipping off the aperture lever and then they’re not as useful with my film bodies.

  6. Hi Simon.

    I’ve just started looking at focal reducers, in particular the Camdiox. User reviews are thin on the ground so thanks for taking the time to do one.

    In the reviews I’ve seen, the same thing comes up – with the Camdiox, the image isn’t as sharp wide open as without. But there’s no recognition that in looking at corners, you’re not testing the same area of lens. With a crop sensor, the corners of the image are not the corners of the lens. With the Camdiox fitted, they are. And the corners of old glass do deteriorate in image quality. With a focal reducer you’re getting all of the lens. Without, you’re getting a centred portion.

    For me, looking at pentax K to micro four thirds – what happens with the central portion is a fair test on whether quality is reduced. Looking at the edges less so, as apples are not being compared with apples, You’re looking at the edges of the image to compare, when, to compare performance of adaptor (rather than end result), you should look at the edges of a crop for the focal reducer adaptor shot, with the edges of a dumb adaptor, although I’d accept that in real world results, it’s the edges of the image you make that is most important.

    Does that make sense?

    Thanks again for the review.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *