Similar Posts

15 Comments

  1. I had the Nex-6 but just never really clicked with it. I cant bash the camera, it was nice, great IQ etc. But as I primarily shoot street photos it was a bit sluggish and occasionally the focus would totally be off the mark. But again it was just not the right fit for me.

  2. Just yesterday I bought the 55-210 mm lens for my nex-6. So far I like it a lot. I’m very happy with the camera. I moved from a point and shoot to the nex-6 so the difference for me is like day and night. I don’t know how is it moving from a DSLR to a mirrorless. The pics I posted today and yesterday were taken with the 55-210 mm lens and most of the pics from the last two months with the kit lens 16-50 mm. I’m just an amateur. I’m sure that someone that is more a pro can get awesome pics.

      1. Ok – thanks for the comments, all appreciated. I don’t often shoot street photos but it’s something I’d like to get into and so I was thinking that the tilt-able lcd might help there – perhaps not.

  3. I think just about everybody will move to the mirrorless cameras in the near future. A much lighter weight will be the reason for me, lighter camera and lenses, means you can use a lighter tripod, all the gear weighing less means the whole bag weighs less. They are using the same censors as the big cameras, so you just need the good glass. Sony has done a great job with their line of mirrorless and I think that other companies are good also.

    1. I think that is exactly it. It’s taken me a while to work out but the thought of being able to take the same pictures with a camera and kit which weighs 1/3 what I currently carry around and for 1/2 the price is very attractive.

  4. I know it’s probably not for you with its fixed prime lens, but I’ve really enjoyed my x100. I know a lot of folks forget to count it as a mirrorless camera, but in fact it is. Have you ever had much experience with the x100 or x100s?
    One of my favorite aspects of the camera is its excellent low-light performance. I’ve heard that the new Sony A7 has poor low-light performance, and this is a huge drawback for me; however, it may not weigh in much depending on your style.
    I’m glad that more and more serious photographers are having a closer look at Sony’s mirrorless line up. No longer just Sony fan boys buying and using them these days.
    I’m sure you’ve had a look, also, at the Olympus Om-d Em-5. I really considered that camera closely before deciding to go with the x100. For me, at the time, it was between the Om-d, the NEX 7, and the x100. I was leaning toward the Nex 7 for a very specific reason, and I’ve forgotten what it was. But after holding the x100 in my hands, and feeling the quality, my mind was made up.
    I can’t wait to hear what you decide to buy.

    1. As always thanks for the comments.

      For me I would only consider a camera with a replaceable lens which counts the x100 out but doesn’t exclude the other fuji cameras which are available. I certainly hear good things about them and will look in more detail at them. I hadn’t heard about the low noise performance of the A7 – being full frame you would expect it to be better performance so that is a bit worrying. To be honest I think that being full frame is probably a reason I would’t look at the A7 because that will mean bigger lenses and more bulk. I’m really attracted to keeping an APS-C sensor but in a tiny body. The Om-d series are certainly worth looking at (although they are m-4/3 I know). Really I feel like a whole new set of cameras are opening up which I’d just not considered before and it’s exciting times.

      By the way I would almost certainly keep the K5 anyway since resale values are so low.

  5. These are great times with a lot of great options and I appreciate them all. In the end I was won over by the many options and relative affordability (mortgage, 3 kids and all) of bodies and (factory and 3rd party) lenses for the M4/3 system. My plan was to get in with the best bang for buck body (Oly E-PL5 in my case), collect an EVF (VF-4), and some good bang for buck lenses. Once I checked off the major lens boxes I would add a top of the range body (planning on adding a OMD EM1 later this year). So far the plan has worked and after some tryouts and trades I have settled on these lenses: Oly 17mm f1.8, Oly 45mm f1.8, Bower 7.5mm fisheye, and my trusty old cheapo Oly 40-150mm zoom. All in everything cost less than or about as much as some body-only choices I was considering and with tablet it all fits in my swiss gear messenger bag. They are great fun (http://500px.com/ericlwoods). Again just one of many great choices out now. Looking forward to hearing what you choose and seeing the results.

    1. Thanks for your thoughts Eric. I started my look at mirrorless with a micro 4/3 in mind (E-PL1) and I may end up there. The lenses available look good and of course there are two manufacturers of micro 4/3 bodies. At the moment I like the NEX 6 because it has the in-built EVF but the modular approach you are taking also sounds appealing. As you say, exciting times

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *